{"schemaVersion":"application-v2","ruleVersion":"5618a343841de6a7a320bde389d28ffbbffb624477c376e26277841b588f9d28","ruleVersionCoversFiles":["/js/fields.mjs","/js/rules.mjs"],"classes":{"validation":"Deterministic shape and length. A failure stops the application and tells you what was observed.","eligibility":"Citizenship, experience band, declarations and the fellowship obligations. A failure stops the application.","duplicate":"One application per person per call. A failure stops the application and can be reviewed by a person.","flag":"Plausibility checks. A flag never rejects an application; it asks an adjudicator to look."},"noAi":"No model decides anything here. Every rule below is a predicate over a value you provided.","rules":[{"id":"V-NAME","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Your name is required and must be between 2 and 120 characters.","reads":["name"]},{"id":"V-EMAIL","ruleClass":"validation","text":"A valid email address is required. From the signed-in account, it is not typed into the application.","reads":["email"]},{"id":"V-INSTITUTION","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Your current affiliation is required and must be between 2 and 160 characters.","reads":["institution"]},{"id":"V-INSTITUTION-ROR","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The ROR id of your institution, if one was chosen, must be a valid ROR id (https://ror.org): a 0, six letters or digits and two check digits, such as 05a28rw58.","reads":["institution_ror"]},{"id":"V-INSTITUTION-FULL","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Your institution must be written out in full, not as an acronym alone (a single word of two to five capital letters, such as \"ETH\" or \"UCL\"), unless it carries a ROR id, which choosing it from the ROR suggestions adds.","reads":["institution","institution_ror"]},{"id":"V-LEVEL","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Your experience level must be one of: band_0_4, band_5_9, band_10_plus.","reads":["level"]},{"id":"V-TERM","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The fellowship term must be one of: 12_months.","reads":["term"]},{"id":"V-MODE","ruleClass":"validation","text":"How you intend to work (on campus, hybrid or remote) must be one of: on_campus, hybrid, remote.","reads":["mode"]},{"id":"V-DURATION-JUSTIFICATION","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Why twelve months fits your plan is required and must be between 150 and 800 characters.","reads":["duration_justification"]},{"id":"V-TITLE","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The project title is required and must be between 4 and 120 characters.","reads":["title"]},{"id":"V-PROBLEM","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The problem and why it matters is required and must be between 200 and 1500 characters.","reads":["problem"]},{"id":"V-BUILD","ruleClass":"validation","text":"What you will build is required and must be between 200 and 1500 characters.","reads":["build"]},{"id":"V-OPENNESS","ruleClass":"validation","text":"How the outputs stay open and reusable is required and must be between 150 and 1000 characters.","reads":["openness"]},{"id":"V-WORKPLAN","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The workplan is required and must be at most 1200 characters.","reads":["workplan"]},{"id":"V-WORKPLAN-MILESTONES","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The workplan must list between 3 and 20 milestones, one per line. A milestone is one non-empty line.","reads":["workplan"]},{"id":"V-BENEFIT","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Who benefits, and how is required and must be between 150 and 600 characters.","reads":["benefit"]},{"id":"V-RISKS","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The main risks and your plan B is required and must be between 100 and 500 characters.","reads":["risks"]},{"id":"V-PROJECT-TOTAL","ruleClass":"validation","text":"The project sections together must not exceed 4000 characters.","reads":["problem","build","openness","workplan","benefit","risks"]},{"id":"V-PRACTICES","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Choose between 1 and 6 open-science practices from: open_source_code, open_data_fair, preprint, open_protocols, open_access_publication, open_hardware.","reads":["os_practices"]},{"id":"V-FIELD","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Your field of expertise is required and must be between 3 and 120 characters.","reads":["field"]},{"id":"V-PORTFOLIO","ruleClass":"validation","text":"A link to your work is required, and it must be an https address.","reads":["portfolio"]},{"id":"V-EXPERTISE","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Why you are exceptional in your field is required and must be between 280 and 1000 characters.","reads":["expertise"]},{"id":"V-TRACK-RECORD","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Your track record of working openly is required and must be between 200 and 800 characters.","reads":["track_record"]},{"id":"V-CONFLICTS","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Declared conflicts of interest, if any, must be at most 600 characters.","reads":["conflicts"]},{"id":"V-CONFLICTS-FULL","ruleClass":"validation","text":"Each declared conflict must be written out in full: a person's full name, or an institution's full name. An entry that is an acronym alone (a single word of two to five capital letters, such as \"ETH\" or \"UCL\", with or without a list marker in front) is refused unless it carries a ROR id, written \"(ror:05a28rw58)\", which choosing an institution from the ROR suggestions adds; that ROR id must be a valid one.","reads":["conflicts"]},{"id":"E-CITIZEN","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"Only citizens of an EU member state are eligible for this call.","reads":["eu_citizen"]},{"id":"E-LEVEL","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"Choose the experience band that matches your years of professional experience: 0 to 4, 5 to 9, or 10 or more. The band decides who reviews your application and nothing else.","reads":["level"]},{"id":"E-RESIDENCY","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"Shared residency: you accept spending up to 90 days of the fellowship at the campus.","reads":["commit_residency"]},{"id":"E-DISSEMINATION","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"Public dissemination: you accept giving a recorded public lecture on your work.","reads":["commit_dissemination"]},{"id":"E-ETHICS","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"You confirm that the work is ethically sound and legally compliant where it will be carried out.","reads":["decl_ethics"]},{"id":"E-OPEN","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"You commit to working openly across the whole research lifecycle, not only at publication.","reads":["commit_open"]},{"id":"E-HONEST","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"You confirm that the information in this application is complete and truthful.","reads":["decl_honest"]},{"id":"E-NO-OTHER-FELLOWSHIP","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"You confirm that you are not holding another full-time fellowship for the same period.","reads":["decl_no_other_fellowship"]},{"id":"E-REVIEW-COMMITMENT","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"Reciprocal review: you commit to reviewing three anonymised applications. All three are released at once when submissions close, and are due 21 days later. If a reviewer drops out you may receive at most one replacement, due 7 days after that. No applicant is penalised for another reviewer failing to review.","reads":["decl_review"]},{"id":"E-IDENTITY","ruleClass":"eligibility","text":"Your account must have at least one verified identity linked, ORCID or LinkedIn. Signing in with a provider proves you control that account; it is not a check of who you are.","reads":[]},{"id":"D-EMAIL","ruleClass":"duplicate","text":"One application per person per call: this account has already submitted one.","reads":["email"]},{"id":"D-SUBJECT","ruleClass":"duplicate","text":"One application per verified identity per call: an ORCID or LinkedIn identity on this account has already been used for this call, including on an account it was later unlinked from.","reads":[]},{"id":"F-HONEYPOT","ruleClass":"flag","text":"A hidden field that should stay empty was filled in.","reads":[]},{"id":"F-FAST","ruleClass":"flag","text":"The application was submitted less than 60 seconds after the draft was created.","reads":[]},{"id":"F-PLACEHOLDER","ruleClass":"flag","text":"A section looks like placeholder text rather than a written answer.","reads":["expertise","problem","build"]},{"id":"F-FIELD-MISMATCH","ruleClass":"flag","text":"Your stated field of expertise shares no significant word with your expertise statement.","reads":["field","expertise"]},{"id":"F-DUPLICATE-TEXT","ruleClass":"flag","text":"Another application in this call has a very similar expertise statement.","reads":["expertise"]},{"id":"F-DUPLICATE-CODE","ruleClass":"flag","text":"Another account in this call submitted an application with the same ISCC-CODE.","reads":[]}],"review":{"packet":{"sections":["Experience band","How the fellow intends to work","Why twelve months fits the plan","Project title","The problem, and why it matters","What will be built","How the outputs stay open and reusable","Workplan and milestones","Who benefits, and how","Risks and plan B","Open practices","Field","Expertise statement","Track record of openness"],"never":"Your name, email, institution, portfolio link, declared conflicts and declarations are never in a packet.","pseudonymous":"Packets are pseudonymous, not anonymous. The title and the project text can identify their author to a peer who knows the field, so write them without self-identifying details. A reviewer is never named to the applicant."},"criteria":[{"id":"01","title":"Demonstrated expertise","question":"Does the applicant show real depth in their field?"},{"id":"03","title":"Track record of openness","question":"Has the applicant already worked openly?"},{"id":"04","title":"Clarity of the project","question":"Is it clear what will be built or researched?"},{"id":"05","title":"Open-science impact","question":"Will the results be open and reusable?"},{"id":"06","title":"Feasibility within duration","question":"Does the plan fit the twelve-month fellowship?"},{"id":"07","title":"Milestone plausibility","question":"Are the milestones concrete and verifiable?"},{"id":"08","title":"Mission fit","question":"Does the project strengthen open science?"},{"id":"09","title":"Community benefit","question":"Who benefits concretely, and how?"},{"id":"10","title":"Risk awareness","question":"Are the main risks named, with a plan B?"}],"portfolio":{"id":"02","title":"Portfolio quality","question":"Is the linked work substantial and verifiable?","scoredBy":"two adjudicators, from the portfolio link, outside the peer round, for drawn entries only"},"portfolioVerification":{"when":"After the draw and before any offer, the portfolio of every drawn entry is verified. It is not part of eligibility and does not change the draw.","who":"Two adjudicators who have declared no conflict with the applicant each score criterion 02, \"Is the linked work substantial and verifiable?\", from 1 to 5. If one scores 2 or less and the other 3 or more, a third adjudicator, named by an admin and not conflicted, scores and decides.","forfeit":"A drawn entry forfeits its seat only if two adjudicators score it 2 or less, each with a written reason. Otherwise it is verified and the offer is sent.","offer":"The 14-day period to accept or decline starts only when the offer is sent.","waitlist":"A forfeited seat goes to the next entry on the waitlist, in draw order, whose portfolio is verified the same way before it is offered the seat.","appeal":"The applicant is told the reasons and may appeal once, within 7 days of being told. The appeal is decided by adjudicators who were not involved in the first check, by the same rule. The seat passes to the next entry only once the forfeit is final: no appeal in time, or the appeal upheld.","record":"The published manifest and the draw are never edited. A forfeit is published as a separate, dated record beside the result."},"scoring":{"scale":"1 to 5 on each criterion, with a comment of 150 to 1200 characters","review":"A review scores the mean of its nine scores.","application":"An application scores the mean of its valid reviews, with equal weight, compared unrounded with 3.5.","adjudicationBand":"Decided by adjudicators instead of the formula: a score from 3.25 to 3.75 inclusive, two reviews 2 or more points apart, or fewer than two valid reviews."},"assignment":{"reviews":"Each applicant whose application passed the check reviews 3 and is reviewed by 3.","never":"Never yourself, never someone you or they declared a conflict with.","order":"The assignment is solved for the whole pool at once from a recorded random seed, preferring the same experience band and a different institution. When no complete assignment exists, these are allowed in this order, each recorded: a reviewer from another band; a reviewer from the same institution, disclosed to both sides; two reviews instead of three; review by the adjudicators.","obligation":"All three reviews are released at once when submissions close and are due 21 days later. A reviewer who misses one is not entered in the draw, and their reviews are reissued, at most one per reviewer, due 7 days later. No applicant is penalised for another reviewer failing to review."},"decisions":{"signers":"Every decision by people is taken by two adjudicators who have declared no conflict with the application, each with a reason. If they disagree, a third adjudicator, named by an admin, decides.","smallPool":"Fewer than 4 applications passing the check: no peer review; the adjudicators decide eligibility against the same criteria.","appeal":"One appeal per applicant, within 7 days of the outcome notice, decided within 7 days by two adjudicators who did not take the original decision. The pool is not published while any appeal is open."}},"identityPolicies":{"file":"/js/identity-policies.mjs","digest":"fe4a983fa0d28b6365152585f8cfd2937c4e91b3045e5cf7ff2ed3f73afe1f21","note":"Each call is judged under one identity policy, chosen before it opens and shown on its application pages. A call opened under osf.identity-policy.v0 is judged by E-IDENTITY above.","policies":[{"version":"osf.identity-policy.v0","title":"Call 1, as published","actions":[{"action":"draft.save","providers":0,"emailVerified":false,"text":"Any signed-in account may save a draft."},{"action":"application.submit","providers":0,"emailVerified":false,"judgedBy":"E-IDENTITY","text":"Any signed-in account may submit. The published rule E-IDENTITY then checks that at least one verified identity (ORCID or LinkedIn) is linked; a failure can be reviewed by a person."}]},{"version":"osf.identity-policy.v1","title":"One identity to draft, two to submit or contribute in public","actions":[{"action":"draft.save","providers":1,"emailVerified":true,"text":"Saving a draft needs an account whose address a sign-in link proved and one linked identity: ORCID, AT Protocol or LinkedIn."},{"action":"application.submit","providers":2,"emailVerified":true,"text":"Submitting needs two linked identities from two different providers among ORCID, AT Protocol and LinkedIn; every pair counts the same, and two accounts at one provider count once. Linking proves control of those accounts, not who you are."},{"action":"community.contribute","providers":2,"emailVerified":true,"text":"Contributing in public (a public edition, a discussion post) needs two linked identities from two different providers among ORCID, AT Protocol and LinkedIn."}]}]}}